Larkin & Lacey Changing Lives

In the wake of Joe Arpaio’s pardoning by President Donald Trump, and the ruling by U.S. District Judge, Susan R. Bolton, Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey, longtime foes of the former sheriff, as well as the practices of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, took to the media to express their disdain with the decision, as well as to detail a condensed list of the many crimes committed by the elected official.

Joe Arpaio, known for his consistent violations of the human rights of Latino Americans throughout Maricopa County, as well as for his “concentration camp,” “tent city,” brought the rift with Phoenix New Times to a new low, when he had Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey arrested for an alleged leak of information regarding a grand jury that was investigating them.

The charges were proven to be bogus, and in less than 24 hours, after the district attorney refused to prosecute, the charges were dropped. This would lead to a three-year court battle between Joe Arpaio and the Phoenix New Times chiefs, in which Larkin and Lacey would emerge victorious, winning a $3.75 million settlement. Learn more about James Larkin and Michael Lacey: and

1970 proved to be a life-altering time for Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey, as well as for the rest of the country. After dropping out from Arizona State University, the world-renowned duo of newspapermen, becoming increasingly aware of the nation’s desire for an effective alternative news outlet, decided to become involved.

On campus, protests were beginning to mount at exponential rates due to the controversial nature of the Vietnam War, and after the Kent State Killings, which were executed by a group of National Guardsmen, Larkin and Lacey were immediately moved to act. Joining a group of students, which consisted of Nick Stupey, Hal Smith, Frank Fiore, and Karen Lofgren, they produced the inaugural issue of Phoenix New Times.

It quickly caught fire and after a short period of time, the group began increasing the size of the free weekly, including satirical cartoons, as well as covering a wide range of events that expanded beyond social commentary.

With Jim Larkin acting as the business partner, helping to secure ads by a number of reputable organizations, including J.C. Penny, Michael Lacey handled to the production of the print paper, quickly taking on the role of Executive Editor.

Throughout the 1970’s, Phoenix New Times continued to grow, becoming one of the most widely read alternative newspapers in the United States, and by the time 1983 hit, they had acquired the Denver-based weekly, Westword, which would play an integral role in their forward expansion.

Eventually, New Times Inc, with Jim Larkin acting as Chief Executive Officer, would be the home to nearly 20 like-minded newspapers, expanding their readership throughout every major U.S. market. After a run that spanned four decades, Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey sold the company to a group of trusted execs, stepping away from journalism for a brief period. Read more: Jim Larkin | and Michael Lacey | Crunchbase

Today, Larkin and Lacey have re-entered the world of investigative journalism, recently launching FrontPage Confidential, which continues the practice of producing fact-based news, while holding true to their commitment to the upholding of the constitutional rights of the people.

Irish Transport and General Workers

James (Jim) Larkin founded the Irish Transport and General Workers’ Union (ITGWU), which then became the biggest union of the region through his work as an activist and Irish Labor organizer.

Larkin was born in Liverpool in 1874 and, although he had very little education, he worked a variety of jobs when he was younger in order to help supplement his family’s income. He worked his way up to be a Foreman at the Liverpool docks. Since he had experience with so many jobs, he saw workers being treated unfairly and then joined the National Union of Dock Labourers (NUDL).

Afterward, he became a union organizer full time. The NUDL didn’t like the methods he used as an organizer, so he was then moved to Dublin two years later. Learn more about James Larkin:

Larkin followed by founding the ITGWU. His goal was to have all industrial workers, whether they were skilled or not, belong to one union. He launched the Irish Worker in 1911, a paper dedicated to the cause.

Since workers in Dublin had very little rights, Larkin founded the Irish Labour Party with James Connolly. He then organized a series of strikes to raise awareness of various issues.

The Dublin Lockout in 1913 was the most significant strike. During this lockout, more than 100,00 employees went on strike, which lasted longer than seven months. During this time, they won the rights to fair employment.

James Larkin never used violence, but instead used strikes and boycotting of goods to get the message across. Most of the press was against Larkin, but he did also have many supporters. When World War I broke out, he held large anti-war demonstrations in Dublin. His message was for Irishmen to not be involved in the war.

Larkin spent some time in America after coming for a lecture tour and raising funds to fight the British. While in America, he was a part of the Socialist Party of America as well as the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW).

Larkin was deported back to Ireland after being convicted of communism and criminal anarchy. Upon returning, he helped establish the Workers’ Union of Ireland and was a member of the Irish Labour Party until his death in 1947.

Read more: Jim Larkin | Biography and Jim Larkin | Wikipedia

The War Against Human Rights Violation by Larkin and Lacey

Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin played a huge role in shaping the city of Arizona which had been affected by the oppression of the immigrants. The two were taking part in journalistic activities before venturing into the act of assisting the community to restore the human rights and democracy. T

he two came up with an organization that was set to boost the efforts of the journey towards gaining their goals in the field. These include Village Voice Media and Phoenix New Times.

The aim of putting up the tow media organization was to fights for the minority rights in the community especially the refugees whose rights had been violated in most parts of the United States.

The person known for the act of the oppression was Joe Arpaio who originated from Maricopa County. There are a lot of challenges that the two organization experience during the process of their mission in the field. For instance the resistance by the Sheriff.

The issues presented by Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin on the matters affecting the lives of the immigrants were not taken seriously by the authorities and the leadership of Sheriff. The primary one includes the molestation of the children and women.

Furthermore, most of the refugees in their workplaces were being discriminated and the government was turning blind eye to the act. Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin rallied the people in the society and informed them about the abuse of power by the authorities.

The two set up an organization that was meant to assist the small unions who were fighting for the human rights in the society financially. The intention was to terminate the issue completely and create a balanced society that respects the human rights. They integrated the right measure in the organization to set their target to the required niche.

The incident attracted concern by the human rights authorities across the globe. Furthermore, they engage the small bodies in various programs of sensitizing the refugees about their rights. The dedication of the two individual in their activities earned them a lot of achievements in their mission. Learn more about Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin: and

The other role of the organization erected by Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin was to stand for the oppressed people in the community and the one denied the freedom of speech in the Arizona city.

There are several organizations of human rights that combined efforts with the one created by Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin. For example, Human Rights Foundation that is based in the New York.

In 2007, Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin faced arrest after the authorities and the order of Sheriff demanded them to be detained. The cause of the act was the statement they had put in their article concerning the issues of the grand jury proceeds.

The public then demanded the two journalists to be freed. They, therefore, sued the state for ordering their arrest. They then won the case and were compensated $ 3.75 million by the state.

They put all the amount in elevating the efforts of gaining the human rights through the various boost to the other programs of the small humanitarians’ organizations.

Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin have placed the right measures in supporting the human rights in the community especially in United States.

Jeremy Goldstein and the Great Compensation Debate

Performance-based pay has been on the top of many company’s agendas in recent years. Businesses always struggle with how to reward their employees for a job well-done, especially considering that these incentive payments are often a large part of the company’s budget. Now, a debate has come up around what the most appropriate way to reward these employees is, and the problem has become so bad that many companies have deferred to lawyers and consultants like Jeremy L. Goldstein to settle their disputes and come to a common resolution.


The main argument for performance-based pay is that it allows employees to feel some ownership in the results of the company. Flat incentive payments do not incentivize employees to raise sales or cut costs. Performance-based metrics give employees a sense of ownership over their own raises. These programs have often led to improved performance over many years as well. However, now many opponents are arguing that Executives have too much power to alter the performance of a company and that these pay programs are far from short-term in their purview.


One of the common metrics used for performance-based-pay programs is EPS, or earnings-per-share. Basic EPS is simply the earnings the company makes for the period in question divided by the number of shares outstanding. Understandably, this metric is very easy for Executives to influence. If they want a particularly successful quarter, they might just hold off on certain expenses or accelerate revenue into that quarter to improve the metrics. Also, EPS is not a measure of how the company will do in the future. It is possible for a company to have a very high EPS, and therefore high incentive payments, one quarter and then miss projections by a large margin in the next quarter. That is why Jeremy Goldstein was brought in to mediate.


With his help, these companies have determined that the best course of action is to mix short-term metrics like EPS with long-term outlooks on performance to determine an incentive program that works for everyone. They also want to make sure that Executives are held accountable for their decisions.


Jeremy Goldstein is a Partner at Jeremy L. Goldstein & Associates. He is based in New York and has been the lead on many compensation and corporate governance cases just like this one. His firm is focused on serving companies that are going through mergers and acquisitions, or those that are just going through major transitions in their structure, to determine the best way to alter their compensation packages.


Jeremy Goldstein has been a lawyer for several years. He earned his M.S. degree from the University of Chicago, and his J.D. from the New York University School of Law. He is currently the chair of the M&A Subcommittee of the Executive Compensation Committee of the American Bar Association Business Section, and he will continue to help companies for years to come.


Visit to learn more.